TransparenSEE
Power behaves differently when money is public and transparency is treated as optional.
Who watches the watchdogs?
This is where public records, institutional replies, court documents, FOIA files, and cross-registry data are turned into readable, citable reporting on how EU-funded organisations, oversight bodies, and public authorities actually operate.
The method is simple: follow the money, the labour, the paper trails.
The question is always the same: what can the public actually verify?
I am unapologetically pro-European, which is exactly why I cannot look away. Transparency is not what auditors can access. It is what the public can verify.
Europe tells whistleblowers to speak up. Then it asks them to prove what the system cannot see.
Europe’s whistleblower framework promises protection, yet when a disclosure simultaneously touches labour law, tax, social security, accounting, anti-fraud oversight, and EU grant controls, the whistleblower is often left carrying the burden of reconstructing a case that no
The €21,352 to €38,976 Brussels NGO pay the public cannot see
€21.352, €32.128, or €38.976. In Brussels’ EU-funded NGO world, sums like these are billed in a single month through private companies and remain largely invisible in the public record. Amounts that far exceed an EU Commissioner’s monthly
What is OLAF hiding? Two mandates and a Transparency HIT
In the 2018 annual report, OLAF still published a country-by-country table of incoming complaints from Member States (Figure 27 – page 57). Belgium: 18. Romania: 58. Spain: 32. Germany: 29. By the 2019 reporting year, that table
Belgium received €31.2 billion in EU funding. OLAF closed four (4) cases in ten years.
Belgium received €31.1 billion in direct-management EU funding over that decade. It hosts the European Commission, the European Parliament, the Council of the EU, and OLAF itself. It is the administrative centre of the union that funds
Working on EU funding, accountability, or public oversight?
Let’s talk.
Conversations are independent, confidential and do not influence editorial work.